Big Bucks: Billions for Surveillance

Tue, Oct 14, 2008

Video Surveillance

This article has been out for a while, but it remains a compelling story: Big Brother’s Big Business at Newsweek.  The article details how, in a post-9/11 world, video monitoring is becoming ubiquitous:

Video surveillance has become the fastest-growing industry within the major categories of electronic security—with nearly one in four major cities in America investing in new technology, analysts say. It has more than doubled in the last five years, becoming an estimated $9.2 billion business in 2005 and expected to grow to $21 billion by 2010, says Joe Freeman, a columnist for Security Technology & Design Magazine and founder and president of J.P. Freeman, a market research and consulting firm.

 A combination of factors are driving the explosive growth in video surveillance.  The ability of cameras to operate on IP networks and for the data to be recorded on digital video recorders (DVRs) is of major importance.  In the past, dedicated wiring was needed for each camera and recording could only be accomplished on a VCR.  In addition to the digital revolution, cameras are getting smarter: now, systems can recognize exception conditions and send that video to monitoring personnel.  This allows a smaller monitoring staff to handle a larger number of cameras – a far cry from the old days of CCTV.

 Today’s smart video camera systems may even reduce the load on conventional police:

Chicago has made recent headlines with its ongoing installation of 2,000 such cameras in its downtown areas, and the city is negotiating with local businesses to link their private cameras to the city system in an effort to form a single, unified network. And many small towns—in states from California to Vermont—have begun using cameras as a way to reduce the need for on-duty officers in local police precincts.

According to the article, the number of video cameras in New York City may exceed 15,000, making it hard for any resident to escape their view.  Public opinion seems to be split – they approve of video surveillance as an anti-terrorism or anti-crime tool, but don’t like to be monitored themselves.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Leave a Reply